Publications in Updating Memory and Prospective Memory

Thomson, R., Pyke, A., Trafton, J. G., & Hiatt, L. M. (2015). An Account of Associative Learning in Memory Recall. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Mehlhorn, K., Taatgen, N.A., Lebiere, C., & Krems, J.F. (2011). Memory Activation and the Availability of Explanations in Sequential Diagnostic Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37, 1391-1411.

Danker, J. & Anderson, J. R. (submitted). Left ventrolateral prefrontal activity during retrieval precisely reflects the difficulty of accessing information in memory. Cerebral Cortex.

West, R. L., Pyke, A. A., Rutledge-Taylor, M. F., & Lang, H. (2010). Interference and ACT-R: New evidence from the fan effect. In D. D. Salvucci & G. Gunzelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 277-281). Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.

Evertsz, R., Busetta, P., Pedrotti, M., Ritter, F. E., & Bittner, J. L. (2008). CoJACK--Achieving principled behaviour variation in a moderated cognitive architecture. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation. 08-BRIMS-025. Orlando, FL: U. of Central Florida.

Danker, J. F., Gunn, P. & Anderson, J. R. (2008). A rational account of memory predicts left prefrontal activation during controlled retrieval. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2674-2685.

Fu, W. T. & Anderson, J. R. (2006) Solving the credit assignment problem: The interaction of explicit and implicit learning with internal and external state information. In proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 238-243 ) . Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Petrov, A. A. (2006). Computationally efficient approximation of the base-level learning equation in ACT-R. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 391-392). Trieste, Italy.

Elio, R. (2006). On modeling intentions for prospective memory performance. In proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1269-1274) . Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Gaissmaier, W., Schooler, L.J., Rieskamp, J. (2006). Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: When are they successful? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(5), 966-982.

Van Maanen, L. & Van Rijn, H. (2005) RACE for retrieval: Competitive effects in memory retrieval. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACT-R Workshop. Trieste, Italy.

Peebles, D. & Bothell, D. (2004). Modelling performance in the sustained attention to response task. In Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 231-236). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University/University of Pittsburgh.

Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., Brock, D. P., & Mintz, F. E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 583-603.

Lebiere, C. & Lee, F. J. (2002). Prospective memory: A context-switching account. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research. Special Issue on top papers of ICCM-2001.

Lebiere, C., & Lee, F. J. (2001). Prospective memory: A computational account. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, pp. 139-144. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schoppek, W. (2000). Memory for continually changing information: A task analysis and model of the keeping track task. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 877-882, Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Gugerty, L. (in press, publication expected May 2007). Cognitive components of troubleshooting strategies. Thinking and Reasoning.

Copyright © 2002-2013 ACT-R Research Group


Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University